MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009349798 · doi:10.1049/ip-map:20040521

Measuring the unloaded, loaded, and external quality factors of one- and two-port resonators using scattering-parameter magnitudes at fractional power levels

2004· article· en· W2009349798 on OpenAlexafffund
Joey R. Bray, Langis Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Microwaves Antennas and Propagation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResonatorPort (circuit theory)Fractional bandwidthScattering parametersBandwidth (computing)Quality (philosophy)Resonance (particle physics)ScatteringQ factorElectric power transmissionPower (physics)PhysicsElectronic engineeringAcousticsOpticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple and fast technique for measuring resonator quality factors is presented, in which only the magnitudes of the s-parameters are used. For the first time, the equations are presented for all of the basic topologies, including one-port reflection, two-port transmission, and two-port absorption resonators, and for all three quality factors, including the unloaded, loaded and external Q. The method is flexible and suitable to a large number of resonators because the required bandwidth may be measured at almost any level, not only at the classical half-power points. These levels are clearly identified as fractions of the absorbed power at resonance. The technique is then demonstrated by analysing a two-port microstrip ring transmission resonator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Microwaves Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207