MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009370006 · doi:10.7202/044441ar

Les pères dans l’histoire : un rôle en évolution

2010· article· fr· W2009370006 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Josée St-Denis, Nérée St-Amand

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ces bribes d’histoire de la paternité nous renseignent sur l’origine de quelques lois, traditions, croyances, moeurs qui ont marqué l’évolution du rôle des pères. Quelle place occupaient-ils? Quelles lois ont influencé leur rôle au sein de la famille? Comment leurs responsabilités ont-elles évolué à travers le temps? Ces questions nous ont motivés à effectuer une première recherche sur l’historique de la paternité dans le cadre de notre mémoire de maîtrise en service social (St-Denis-Patry, 2002). Sept ans plus tard, du mémoire à l’article, nous y avons ajouté un bilan de nos recherches sur la paternité et, avec l’aide du co-auteur, nous proposons certaines réflexions sur des enjeux sociaux qui s’y relient. Cet article présente d’abord quelques volets de l’histoire de la paternité en touchant brièvement la période de l’Antiquité, le Moyen-âge en France et l’ère préindustrielle et industrielle, tant en France qu’au Québec. Par la suite, nous proposons quelques liens entre certains phénomènes sociaux contemporains comme le divorce, la monoparentalité et la garde partagée et les nouveaux rôles des pères. Une réflexion sur certaines conséquences de tels changements au niveau de l’intervention sociale conclura ce texte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.022
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207