MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009417399 · doi:10.1002/mats.200390018

Comparing Strategies for the Synthesis of Polyolefinic Thermoplastic Elastomers via Macromonomer Incorporation

2003· article· en· W2009417399 on OpenAlexaff
M. Haag, Leonardo C. Simon, João B. P. Soares

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Theory and Simulations · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComonomerMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryCopolymerPolypropyleneRadius of gyrationElastomerMacromonomerPolymer scienceThermoplastic elastomerPost-metallocene catalystMonte Carlo methodPopulationThermoplasticComposite materialPolymerMetalloceneMathematicsPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The microstructure of polyolefinic thermoplastic elastomers made with a combination of two single‐site catalysts was analyzed by Monte Carlo simulation. The model can be used to describe the crystallizable fraction for both long‐chain branched polypropylene ( a PP‐ g ‐ i PP) and long‐chain branched ethylene/ α ‐olefin copolymers (PE α O‐ g ‐PE). The simulations showed that at levels of 7.5% of comonomer incorporation, PE α O‐ g ‐PE samples reach a similar crystallizability level of a PP‐ g ‐ i PP. From a topological point of view, it was demonstrated that the fraction of free arms and inner segments tend to the limit of ½ for highly branched chains and that the fraction of free arms reaches its maximum value when the Y‐type chains are the predominant population. A mathematical correlation between the linear‐ and LCB catalyst probabilities was proposed to ensure the production of symmetrical branched chains. Long‐chain branch architecture of PE α O‐ g ‐PE. magnified image Long‐chain branch architecture of PE α O‐ g ‐PE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Theory and SimulationsSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207