Corneal Myxoma Arising in a Patient With Repeated Phototherapeutic Keratectomies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We report the clinical and pathologic findings of a corneal myxoma that was diagnosed in a cornea that had undergone phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK). METHODS: A corneal myxoma was identified in a full-thickness keratoplasty specimen obtained from a 51-year-old man with a history of a forceps injury to his right eye at birth. The patient had presented with corneal edema and bullous keratopathy, which was treated on 3 occasions with PTK, resulting in progressive, persistent milky-white clouding of the cornea. This represents the eighth case of corneal myxoma in the reviewed literature and the first described after PTK. Thorough histopathologic and ultrastructural analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The histochemical, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic findings were consistent with previously reported corneal myxomas. Most of the reported myxomas arising in the cornea presented with a history of prior corneal disease or injury and showed absence or disruption of Bowman layer histopathologically, as was found in our patient. CONCLUSION: The pathogenesis of corneal myxomas involves a reactive process that requires an antecedent affliction, in contrast to the neoplastic mesenchymal histogenesis of myxomas characterized in other parts of the body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".