MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009431782 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2011.2172230

Queuing Performance of Multichannel S-ALOHA Systems With Correlated Arrivals

2011· article· en· W2009431782 on OpenAlexaff
Jun-Bae Seo, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlohaComputer scienceRetransmissionNetwork packetQueueing theoryQueueMarkov processQueue management systemThroughputReal-time computingTelecommunications linkComputer networkMarkov chainQuality of serviceRandom accessCapture effectCollisionMathematicsStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we examine the queuing performance of terminals in a multichannel centralized S-ALOHA system with a finite terminal population and finite queue size in each terminal, employing a uniform backoff (UB) algorithm with retry limit for collision resolution. The performance evaluations focus on uplink traffic from web browsing, which is modeled as a Markov-modulated Bernoulli process with correlated arrivals. We analyze the system performance in terms of system throughput, mean queue length, mean delay, the probability that a packet is dropped by retry limit, the probability that a packet is blocked by a full queue, and the mean and variance of packet retransmission time, in relation to the source correlation, number of channels, window size, and retry limit. For comparison, we also consider bufferless terminals with correlated arrivals. In addition, we evaluate by simulations the performance of terminals with finite queue size when they have perfect knowledge of the backlog size. Results from our study allow the parameters of the UB algorithm to properly be chosen to meet the access-level quality-of-service requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207