MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009445419 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr:20060299

Computationally fast techniques to reduce AWGN and speckle in videos

2007· article· en· W2009445419 on OpenAlexaff
Debashis Sen, M. N. S. Swamy, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInter frameComputer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseKalman filterWiener filterEstimatorArtificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Adaptive filterSpatial filterMotion estimationComputer visionAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsFrame (networking)White noiseReference frameStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fast schemes to reduce additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and speckle in videos are presented. The proposed schemes use a change detection technique to measure the interframe motion and carry out estimations in both the spatial and temporal directions of the video. In the case of AWGN reduction, the well-known edge adaptive Wiener filter is used to perform the spatial estimation. Two different filters to carry out temporal estimation are presented based on novel weighted scalar Kalman and weighted running average filters, respectively. These temporal estimators are applied on the spatial estimate to obtain the spatiotemporal estimate. A new method is then used to appropriately combine the spatial and spatiotemporal estimates in order to obtain the final estimate of the uncorrupted signal. To achieve speckle reduction, we use an unbiased homomorphic system that comprises an edge adaptive filter for spatial estimation and the weighted running average filter for temporal estimation. The effectiveness of the various proposed algorithms is demonstrated and compared with that of some of the existing schemes through extensive simulations. It is found that the use of a change detection technique, instead of the popularly used complex motion estimation and compensation technique, to measure the interframe motion results in a considerable reduction of processing time. The proposed schemes perform equally well or better than the existing schemes in reducing the noise in videos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Image ProcessingSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207