Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifiant de l'opération archéologique : 10222 Date de l'opération : 2009 (SD) 1 Les études menées dans les réseaux d'Orgnac par le laboratoire Edytem depuis 2004 ont permis de comprendre en partie la genèse et le fonctionnement des réseaux Orgnac-Issirac sur une grande échelle de temps.À une échelle temporelle plus réduite, les informations recélées par le cône d'éboulis n'étaient pas accessibles.De ce fait, et en vue de compléter les données manquantes de la salle Robert de Joly, un sondage a été effectué en 2009 sur ce cône.2Celui-ci a livré une quantité d'informations liées à l'érosion de surface, à la faune fréquentant le plateau, mais aussi aux activités humaines à travers le temps.Le puits et le cône sont indissociables et fonctionnent dans un système d' « interface ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".