Évaluation de la qualité de vie liée à la santé et des problèmes de santé prioritaires chez les patients atteints du cancer de la prostate : stratégie de définition du rôle des infirmières en pratique avancée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un cadre régissant l’institution et l’évaluation des rôles en pratique infirmière avancée (PIA) souligne l’importance de l’adoption d’une approche méthodique dans le développement de rôles basés sur l’évaluation des besoins de santé des patients. Cette étude visait à déterminer la qualité de vie liée à la santé (QVLS) chez les patients atteints du cancer de la prostate afin de comparer les perceptions, de cerner les problèmes de santé les plus graves et les plus fréquents et enfin, de dégager les perceptions des patients, le tout en vue d’éclairer le développement du rôle en matière de soins de soutien des infirmières de formation avancée en oncologie auprès des patients atteints d’un cancer de la prostate avancé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.048 | 0.081 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".