Photochemical cooperativity in photosystem II. Characterization of oxygen evolution discontinuities in the light-response curves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In two previous papers (Fragata et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 14707-14714; Fragata et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 3315-3320), it was shown that the variation of oxygen evolution with the light intensity (I) in photosystem II (PSII) in steady state conditions can be formulated according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm for heterogeneous catalysis. This yielded the expression OEth = OEth(max) I/(L1/2 + I), where OEth is the theoretical oxygen evolution, OEth(max) the maximum oxygen evolution, and L1/2 the irradiance giving OEth(max)/2. In this approximation, the photons interaction with the chlorophylls in the PSII reaction center is assumed to be a heterogeneous reaction in which the light is represented as a stream of particles instead of an electromagnetic wave. That is, the chlorophyll molecules are the adsorption surfaces (or heterogeneous catalysts), and the incident (or exciting) photons are the substrate, or the reagent. Recently, the examination of new experimental data obtained with 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone (DCBQ) and p-benzoquinone (pBQ) as exogenous electron acceptors, disclosed the presence of oxygen evolution discontinuities (or transitions) in the light-response curves. The new data were fitted with a mathematical summation of hyperbola of order n(i) > 1, OEth = Sigma(i) [OEth(max)]iIn(i)/[(L1/2)i(n(i)) + I(n(i))], where the n(i)'s are the number of sites used by the incident photons in their interaction with the photosynthetic pigments in each population i of PSII centers open for photochemistry. The mathematical simulations yielded only three distinct n(i)'s, that is, 1.8, 4.8, 8.5 and 1.8, 4.2, 8.4 for isolated PSII particles incubated with DCBQ and pBQ, respectively. Implicitly, this means the simultaneous excitation of each PSII reaction center with more than one photon, that is, the excitation of more than one pigment molecule. It is suggested that these transitions have their origin in the cooperative interaction of the photons and the chlorophylls, and most likely also the pheophytins. This indicates that the discontinuities (or transitions) observed in the light-response curves of oxygen evolution are consistent with the hypothesis of photochemical cooperativity in photosystem II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".