MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009549967 · doi:10.1149/1.3570012

Metal Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell by Freeze Tape Casting

2011· article· en· W2009549967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTape castingSolid oxide fuel cellPorosityShrinkageComposite materialMetalParticle sizeOxideCastingSinteringComposite numberMetallurgyStrontiumCathodeChemical engineeringElectrolyteChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freeze tape casting was used to fabricate a porous metal support for the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). The parameters that affect tape quality, such as casting temperature, solid loading, amount of additives and particle size of steel powders, have been investigated. It was found that that casting temperatures between -40°C and -80°C did not affect pore size and structure of the metallic tapes. The porosity and shrinkage rate of the metallic tapes is highly influenced by the solid loading, but not by the particle size of the steel powders. Multiple layers of the single cell structure were deposited on the freeze cast green tape by screen printing. A composite cathode of nano-size lanthanum strontium manganite (LSM) plus YSZ was obtained by infiltration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it