MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009598480 · doi:10.1353/cat.2012.0111

Parisian Licentiates in Theology, A.D. 1373-1500: A Biographical Register. Vol. II: The Secular Clergy (review)

2012· article· en· W2009598480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Traver

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsopographyRegister (sociolinguistics)The RenaissanceHistoryMiddle AgesTheologyClassicsArtArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Parisian Licentiates in Theology, A.D. 1373-1500: A Biographical Register. Vol. II: The Secular Clergy Andrew G. Traver Parisian Licentiates in Theology, A.D. 1373-1500: A Biographical Register. Vol. II: The Secular Clergy. By Thomas Sullivan, O.S.B. [Education and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, Vol. 37.] (Leiden: Brill. 2011. Pp. xii, 636. $255.00. ISBN 978-9-004-20270-2.) The work under consideration is the second volume of Thomas Sullivan's prosopographical study of Parisian graduates in theology from the years 1373-1500. This volume concerns itself with the secular licentiates in theology. Modern interest in identifying the actual graduates of the theological faculty of the medieval University of Paris began with the four-volume Chartularium universitatis parisiensis of Heinrich Denifle and Émile Chatelain (Paris, 1889-97) and continued with Palémon Glorieux's two-volume study of the Parisian theological masters in the thirteenth century, Répertoire des maîtres en théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle (Paris, 1933-34). More recently, James Farge has pionereed the biographical study of sixteenth-century Parisian theologians in his Biographical Register of Paris Doctors of Theology, 1500-1536 (Toronto, 1980). In the last decade, detailed and thoughtful studies both by William Courtenay and James Farge have provided scholars with a better description of the Parisian academic community and its milieu within the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries respectively. Sullivan's earlier prosopographical study of Benedictine monks at the University of Paris from 1229 to 1500 (New York, 1995) identified and provided valuable biographical information about Benedictine and Cluniac monks who attended the University of Paris during that time period. As his chief source for the present volume, Sullivan utilizes the Registrum Facultatis theologiae. Ordo licentiatorum 1373-1694, found in the manuscript Paris, BnF ms lat 5657-A and compiled by Philip Bouvot, beadle of the Parisian Faculty of Theology in the seventeenth century. This work presents a biographical register of 461 secular clerics licensed in theology from 1373 to 1500. Sullivan begins his study with a detailed discussion of Bouvot's register and then examines the most useful reference sources for the University of Paris, its Faculty of Theology, and its colleges for the period under review. He next presents a chronological list of all theological graduates, both secular and religious, totaling 1044 names (pp. 9-44). The bulk of the work is a biographical register of the secular graduates in theology arranged alphabetically. What follows is a detailed biographical survey of each graduate, providing variations in the form and spelling of his name. He then notes the date of the graduate's licensing ceremony, the rank earned by the individual within the total number of students graduating within his licentiate class, and the date when the individual was magistratus as a master of theology. Sullivan next identifies the geographical origin of the licentiate and, through his detailed [End Page 369] biographical study, is able to place each licentiate within a meaningful historical context. Following the entry for each licentiate is a bibliography of his writings and the sources for that bibliography. Sullivan also has included two appendices; one arranges the secular licentiati according to their first name, whereas the second organizes them according to their college affiliation. What Sullivan has compiled here is an extremely useful reference tool for historians of the University of Paris. He has filled a large lacuna in the historical scholarship by first identifying the names of the secular graduates in theology of the University of Paris for the last quarter of the fourteenth century and all of the fifteenth century, and then providing them with a thorough and scholarly biographical analysis. Sullivan's work—in the tradition of Glorieux, Farge, and Courtenay—will remain one the standard reference manuals for anyone studying the Parisian Faculty of Theology in the medieval and early-modern periods. Andrew G. Traver Southeastern Louisiana University Copyright © 2012 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207