MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009601103 · doi:10.1089/jpm.2011.0456

Comparing Symptom Burden in Patients with Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Cancer

2012· article· en· W2009601103 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yunie Kim, Irene H. Yen, Michael W. Rabow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Palliative Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNauseaPalliative carePerformance statusCancerAnxietyQuality of life (healthcare)DiseaseDepression (economics)Internal medicinePhysical therapyPsychiatryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of patients with advanced cancer have been extensively studied, but less attention has been paid to the symptomatology of patients with localized disease. We compared the symptom burden of outpatients with cancer, either metastatic or localized disease, seen in a palliative care comanagement clinic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study assessing patient symptoms with multiple patient surveys, including a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Survey (to assess pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and nausea), along with a spiritual well-being screen and questions about relationships and quality of life. Consecutive patients at a comprehensive cancer center completed the surveys prior to their first visit to an outpatient palliative care clinic providing palliative care concurrently with the patients' oncologic treatments. Patients were referred by their oncologist, radiation oncologist, oncologic surgeon, or primary care physician without respect to their stage or prognosis. Statistical analyses used were χ(2), Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, and multivariate linear regression. Significance was taken as p<0.05. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were included in this study. One hundred and twenty-seven patients (62%) had metastatic cancer and 78 (38%) had nonmetastatic cancer. The characteristics of the two study groups were similar with regard to age, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, partnership status, and insurance status. Patients with metastatic disease and localized disease had similar mean symptom burden and mean individual symptom intensity for all symptoms evaluated except for nausea, which was worse in patients with metastatic disease (3.4 versus 2.5, p=0.0028). Nausea was also worse in younger patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients referred to a cancer center outpatient palliative care clinic, symptom burden is similar in patients with localized and metastatic disease. Even patients with relatively good prognoses may nevertheless have significant symptom burdens in physical, emotional, and existential domains. The palliative care needs of all patients must be assessed, regardless of stage or prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Palliative MedicineSame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207