Exploiting sparsity and rank-deficiency in dynamic MRI reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work addresses the problem of dynamic MRI reconstruction from partially sampled K-space. When the frames of the dynamic MRI sequences are stacked as columns of a matrix, the resultant matrix is both sparse (in a transform domain) and rank-deficient. The dynamic MRI sequence is reconstructed by solving an optimization problem that minimizes a sum of sparsity and rank-deficiency penalties subject to data constraints (K-space data acquisition model). In this work, we propose a non-convex optimization problem for dynamic MRI reconstruction where the sparsity penalty is an l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm and the rank-deficiency penalty is the Schatten-q norm (0<;p,q≤1). There is no algorithm to solve this combined l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">p</sub> -norm and Schatten-q norm minimization problem; hence we derive a new algorithm based on the Majorization Minimization method. Our proposed method shows considerable improvement in reconstruction results over state-of-the-art techniques in dynamic MRI reconstruction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".