MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009622598 · doi:10.1139/t03-006

Three-dimensional stress effects on time-dependent swelling behaviour of shaly rocks

2003· article· en· W2009622598 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Bipul Hawlader, Y N Lee, K. Y. Lo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSwellingOil shaleStress (linguistics)Geotechnical engineeringLateral strainPerpendicularPrincipal stressGeologyConstitutive equationMaterials scienceComposite materialStructural engineeringFinite element methodGeometryEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a time-dependent constitutive model that has been developed for the swelling of shaly rocks. Laboratory test results on many shales, including Queenston shale, show that the swelling of these rocks depends on the applied stresses. The applied stress in one principal stress direction reduces swelling strain not only in that direction but also in the perpendicular directions. It was found that swelling strain reductions are nonlinearly dependent on applied stress. The reduction in lateral swelling caused as a result of axial stress is modeled using the "pseudo-Poisson's effect". The proposed model is used to simulate the development of swelling strain with time under uniaxial and biaxial stress conditions. Comparison between the computed and experimental results shows that the pseudo-Poisson's effect is a key parameter for simulating the observed time-dependent swelling.Key words: swelling, Queenston shale, modeling, three-dimensional stress effect, nonlinearity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207