MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009644301 · doi:10.1002/jemt.1129

Pituitary adenylate cyclase‐activating polypeptide and its receptors in amphibians

2001· review· en· W2009644301 on OpenAlexafffund
Laurent Yon, David Alexandre, Maïté Montero‐Hadjadje, Nicolas Chartrel, Lydie Jeandel, Mauro Vallarino, J. Michael Conlon, Sakaé Kikuyama, Alain Fournier, Francisco Gracia‐Navarro, Eric W. Roubos, Bkc Chow, Akira Arimura, Youssef Anouar, Hubert Vaudry

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Research and Technique · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier MuseumInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRégion NormandieCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekConseil Régional de Haute NormandieInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversité de RouenInstitut national de la recherche scientifiqueNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAdenylate kinaseCyclaseReceptorChemistryCell biologyEndocrinologyPituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptideInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistryVasoactive intestinal peptideNeuropeptideMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), a novel peptide of the secretin/glucagon/vasoactive intestinal polypeptide superfamily, has been initially characterized in mammals in 1989 and, only 2 years later, its counterpart has been isolated in amphibians. A number of studies conducted in the frog Rana ridibunda have demonstrated that PACAP is widely distributed in the central nervous system (particularly in the hypothalamus and the median eminence) and in peripheral organs including the adrenal gland. The cDNAs encoding the PACAP precursor and 3 types of PACAP receptors have been cloned in amphibians and their distribution has been determined by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Ontogenetic studies have revealed that PACAP is expressed early in the brain of tadpoles, soon after hatching. In the frog Rana ridibunda, PACAP exerts a large array of biological effects in the brain, pituitary, adrenal gland, and ovary, suggesting that, in amphibians as in mammals, PACAP may act as neurotrophic factor, a neurotransmitter and a neurohormone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy Research and TechniqueSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207