Following the Thermal Activation of Au<sub>25</sub>(SR)<sub>18</sub> Clusters for Catalysis by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We show the thermal activation of phenylethanethiolate (L = SC 8 H 9 ) and hexanethiolate (L = SC 6 H 13 ) Au 25 L 18 monolayer protected clusters (MPCs) on carbon black supports, followed by characterization with extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). EXAFS analysis shows that the thiolate stabilizers can be partially removed from the surface under mild heating conditions without significant changes in the cluster size. The resulting clusters are shown to be catalytically active for the reduction catalysis of 4-nitrophenol. EXAFS and TEM data show that thermal treatment under air at 200 °C leads to nearly complete removal of all of the thiolate stabilizers with little to no growth in cluster size, while cluster sintering was seen at higher calcination temperatures. The maximum catalytic activity for Au 25 (SC 8 H 9 ) 18 MPCs was seen at 250 °C activation conditions. These results are consistent with results reported earlier for Au 25 (SR) 18 clusters on ceria by Jin et al., who suggested that cluster integrity was maintained during mild activation conditions. Here, EXAFS data unambiguously show that while the cluster size does not grow significantly, such mild heating conditions do lead to nearly complete removal of the thiolate stabilizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it