MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009651704 · doi:10.1191/0959-683604hl733rp

Optical dating studies of mud-dominated alluvium and buried hearth-like features from Red River Valley, southern Manitoba, Canada

2004· article· en· W2009651704 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Olav B. Lian, G R Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Holocene · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsRadiocarbon datingGeologyAlluviumChronologyHearthThermoluminescence datingPleistoceneSedimentPaleosolArchaeologyAlluvial fanPaleontologySedimentary rockLoessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical dating studies of samples of late-Holocene mud-dominated alluvium, and heated alluvium in features interpreted to be hearths, collected from the banks of the Red River, southern Manitoba, Canada, were undertaken to assess the viability of these deposits as chronometers for floodplain evolution. Optical dating was done by utilizing the violet luminescence emitted during infrared excitation of the potassium feldspar in the fine-silt polymineral fraction. The alluvial samples, dated by radiocarbon to be about 1 ka old, yielded maximum limiting optical ages between about 1 and 5 ka, indicating that optical dating of such samples may provide useful chronological information in cases where material suitable for radiocarbon dating is lacking, or in cases where a radiocarbon chronology needs support. Furthermore, the surprisingly low residual optical ages from sediments of this type indicate that there is a high proability that sediments representing similar mud-dominated alluvial environments in the Pleistocene record will yield ages with adequate precision and accuracy. Bulk sediment extracted from the centre of a buried hearth yielded an optical age (1.4 ± 0.2 ka) that was broadly consistent with its associated calibrated radiocarbon age (0.23-1.05 ka), but good agreement (0.79 ± 0.09 ka) was achieved when small fragments of hard-baked mud (ñ0.5 g) extracted from within the feature were optically dated separately; hard-baked fragments from two other hearths yielded similar results. Optical dating of sediments from hearths formed in mud-dominated alluvial sediments thus represents a viable method for obtaining a useful chronology in circumstances where organic material suitable for radiocarbon dating is absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HoloceneSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207