Implicaciones del tsunami de Tohoku del año 2011 para la gestión de desastres naturales en Japón
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On March 11th 2011, a large earthquake of magnitude 9.0 on the Richter scale occurred offshore the northeast coast of Japan, generating a major tsunami which devastated large parts of Japan’s north-eastern coastline. The “Great Eastern Japan Earthquake and Tsunami” has been described as one in several thousand years event, and as a consequence it is necessary that the revising of the philosophy behind Coastal Disaster Management in Japan take into account the lessons learned from this latest disaster. In this article, the authors present the results of their field surveys in the Tohoku area, describing the damage in various places and analysing the failure mechanism of a variety of coastal structures. The authors also present some changes that are currently occurring in the risk management philosophy in Japan. Essentially, the idea that infrastructure measures can always protect against the loss of life has been discarded, and although they can play a part in the protection of property ultimately planification measures should be the cornerstone of the strategy to protect people´s lives in coastal areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".