MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novos táxons em Elaphidionini (Cerambycinae) e Onciderini (Lamiinae) e novos registros em Cerambycidae

2008· article· pt· W2009667729 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Helena M. Galileo, Ubirajara R. Martins

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Entomologia · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera: Cerambycidae studies
Canadian institutionsDillon Consulting
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyLonghorn beetleZoologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fundamentados em material da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (Museu de Entomologia), descreve-se em Cerambycinae, Elaphidionini: Magaliella gen. nov., espécie-tipo, M. punctata sp. nov. (Espírito Santo) e em Lamiinae, Onciderini: Oncideres hoffmanni sp. nov. (Bahia). Acrescentam-se novos registros para o Brasil: Potiaxixa intermedia (Martins, 1979) (Bahia); Appula melancholica Gounelle, 1909 (Distrito Federal), Pseudogisostola reichardti Fontes & Martins, 1977 (Rio de Janeiro), Hesycha bimaculata Martins & Galileo, 1990 (Bahia) e .Xenofrea apicalis Melzer, 1931 (Rio de Janeiro).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de EntomologiaSame topicColeoptera: Cerambycidae studiesFrench-language works237,207