Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L ’ergotherapie se trouve a une intersection dans son evolution en tant que profession. De plus en plus, nous constatons que les faits scientifiques entrecroisent l’obligation de rendre compte et la pratique exemplaire et que les ergo-therapeutes possedent les competences requises pour reagir a cette evolution. Le milieu de l’edition se trouve egalement a une intersection, alors que les methodes d’impression traditionnelles croisent un nombre croissant de publications sur le World Wide Web. Un grand nombre de revues scientifiques envisagent d’emprunter l’autoroute electronique qui constitue, a leur avis, une methode plus rapide et plus efficace pour diffuser l’information et pour repondre aux besoins des lecteurs. Au cours des deux dernieres annees, la Revue canadienne d’ergotherapie a ressenti l’onde de choc de ces intersections. Avec la croissance continue de la profession, tant sur les lignes de front de la pratique quotidienne que dans le domaine de la recherche, on a constate une augmentation substantielle du nombre d’articles soumis a la revue. Ceci, par ricochet, a entraine de plus longues periodes d’attente pour la publication des articles, en raison de l’espace d’impression limite. Le milieu de l’edition electronique gagne en popularite aupres des lecteurs. Ces intersections ont pousse les membres du comite de redaction de la RCE a chercher des facons d’apporter des changements a l’edition imprimee, tout en augmentant la capacite de publication et cela, en ajoutant une edition hâtive de la RCE, en version electronique. L’edition hâtive sera publiee trois fois par annee pour permettre une diffusion plus rapide des articles acceptes pour publication. Cette edition ne remplacera pas la version imprimee de la revue; les articles qui sont publies dans la version electronique paraitront dans la version imprimee des que l’espace sera disponible. La mise en page de la revue a ete modifiee afin d’utiliser le plus judicieusement possible l’espace d’impression disponible pour la publication. Comme le mandat de la RCE est de publier des articles revises par les pairs, la Perspective nationale et le mot de la redactrice seront publies moins frequemment. Par ailleurs, des versions abregees des prises de position seront publiees dans la version imprimee; les versions completes de ces prises de position seront affichees dans la version web. Ces mesures devraient permettre de publier de 6 a 8 articles supplementaires annuellement, ce qui equivaut a un numero additionnel de la RCE. Nous sommes privilegies d’avoir des richesses en abondance. Cette croissance de notre capacite de publication, de meme que la publication des articles dans de meilleurs delais constituent une etape importante dans l’histoire de la Revue canadienne d’ergotherapie. O ccupational therapy is at an intersection in its development as a profession. Increasingly, we see that evidence intersects with accountability and best practice and occupational therapists have the necessary skills to respond to this development. There is also an intersection in the publishing world, where traditional print methods are meeting with the growth of publishing on the World Wide Web. Many journals are looking towards the electronic world as both a faster and more effective method to disseminate information and meet reader’s needs. Over the past 2 years, the Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy has experienced the impact of these intersections. With the continued growth of the profession, both on the frontlines of daily practice and in research, there has been a substantial increase in the number of submissions to the journal. This, in turn, has resulted in longer waiting periods for articles to be published due to limited print space. The electronic publishing world is also gaining popularity with readers. As a result of these intersections, the journal has looked to make changes to the print edition as well as expand the capacity to publish through the addition of the CJOT Early Electronic Edition. The early edition will be published three times a year and articles accepted for publication will be published in a timelier manner. This edition of CJOT will not replace the print version of the journal; papers that are published in the electronic version will appear in print as the space becomes available The journal’s layout has been modified to make the maximum use of the print space that is available for publishing. As the mandate of the publication is to publish peerreviewed articles, the National Perspective and From the Editor columns will be less frequent. Abbreviated versions of position statements will be published in the print version, with the full version available on the web version. It is anticipated that these changes will result in the additional publication of approximately 6 to 8 articles per year, which is equivalent to approximately one extra issue of the journal. We feel fortunate that we have an abundance of riches. Growth in our capacity to publish, both in a timelier fashion and in number of articles, signifies an important step forward in the history of the Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it