MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2009706405 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.cec13-a14

Abstract A14: Understanding the role of ATRX in the development and progression of glioma

2013· article· en· W2009706405 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah E. Goldberg, Kristin D. Kernohan, Nathalie G. Bérubé

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsATRXCarcinogenesisBiologyEpigeneticsGliomaCancer researchCancerForebrainChromatinSynthetic lethalityGeneticsGeneNeuroscienceMutationCentral nervous systemDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gliomas are tumors that arise from glial cells within the brain and spinal cord and account for approximately 30% of all central nervous system neoplasms. Emerging evidence indicates that unique molecular and genetic footprints define glioma subtypes. The Atrx gene is commonly mutated in a subset of gliomas across all tumor grades and within both the pediatric and adult populations. ATRX is a chromatin remodeling protein that is necessary for proper neural development. Loss of ATRX conditionally in the forebrain of the mouse starting at embryonic day 8.5 leads to an increase in replication stress and p53-mediated cortical cell death. Microarray analysis of control and Atrx-null neonatal forebrains indicates a significant increase in the expression of many cancer-related genes. Many of these overexpressed genes are involved in cellular migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition — important cellular phenotypes known to contribute to glioma development. Our data highlight oncogenic signaling pathways that become activated in the absence of the ATRX protein in the brain that may promote tumorigenesis when combined with additional genetic mutations, such as p53 mutations. Citation Format: Hannah E. Goldberg, Kristin D. Kernohan, Nathalie G. Berube. Understanding the role of ATRX in the development and progression of glioma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Chromatin and Epigenetics in Cancer; Jun 19-22, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(13 Suppl):Abstract nr A14.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→