MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009711169 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/12/31/315

Optical Zeeman effect measurements on isolated and ferromagnetically coupled Nd<sup>3+</sup>ions in weakly doped YVO<sub>4</sub>crystals: evidence for lack of crystal field perturbations in ion pair interactions

2000· article· en· W2009711169 on OpenAlexaff
V. Mehta, O. Guillot-Noël, Didier Gourier, Zahia Ichalalène, M. Castonguay, S. Jandl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeeman effectIonNeodymiumAtomic physicsCrystal (programming language)Hamiltonian (control theory)DopingStark effectChemistryMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsPhysicsElectric fieldOpticsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical Zeeman effect measurements are performed at liquid helium temperature on Nd3+ ions in weakly doped YVO4 crystals in the range 11 350-11 390 cm-1 of the 4F3/2→ 4I9/2 neodymium transitions. This study provides confirmation that the concentration dependent satellite lines accompanying the optical transitions are due to ferromagnetically coupled pairs of Nd3+ ions in undistorted Y3+ sites of D2d point site symmetry. Nonlinear Zeeman splittings are observed in the range of experimental magnetic fields. These splittings are compared with those simulated from crystal field calculations by introducing the Zeeman Hamiltonian into the secular determinant before diagonalization. A reasonably good agreement between the calculated and experimental g-values is obtained, confirming that the exchange coupled neodymium pairs experience no crystal field perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207