Investigation on the Failures Experienced in Deaerators and Solution Recommendation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internals in the deaerators of a refinery plant were reported to have experienced a series of failures since their installation in 1985. These failures included development of cracks in the floor plates, damage of supports and breakage of fillet welds. Two possible root causes were initially identified; thermal stresses due to transient conditions and flow induced vibration. The former cause was classified as unlikely since the deaerators were always operating on steady-state conditions. No cyclic operating conditions were imposed on these deaerators. Vibrations however posed as the most likely root cause for the series of failures. The refinery plant inspectors reported that vibrations on the deaerators, although have not been measured, could be physically felt. These vibrations appear to be continuous and increase linearly with load. A finite element analysis was performed to determine the natural frequency of the deaerators. Mode shapes predicted from this calculation show that vibrations could have caused the failures of the internals. Furthermore, the lowest natural frequency of the deaerators appeared to fall within the actual vibration frequency on site (∼20 Hz). Although not confirmed, it is highly suspected that the vibration was excited by the flow (low pressure steam). Several repair options were explored to overcome this problem. These options were concentrated in increasing the stiffness of the steam inlet pipe and the deaerator floor. Finite element assessments demonstrated that the current flexible deaerator floor was the reason for the low natural frequency. An option of introducing reinforcement strips to the bottom side of the floor was identified as the best option to increase the natural frequency of the deaerator and this is expected to overcome the vibration problem. Only one vessel was assessed but the results apply to the other vessels since they are similar in design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".