Demand Response: From Classification to Optimization Techniques in Smart Grid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In conventional grids, consumer has not been con-side red for solving the problems associated with electric industry. In order to meet the ever increasing consumers' demand, conventional methods primarily rely on increasing generation capacity which is not a feasible solution due to limited resources. Thus, the overall efficiency of electrical networks needs to be improved. From this perspective, the idea of smart grids has transformed the conventional power system into an intelligent and smart one. Smart grid is not a single technology, rather, it is merger of electrical power networks with communications network. Moreover, there are two basic players in the smart grid, utility and consumer. In response to different pricing schemes, introduced by the utility, smart grid transforms the consumer into a prosumer via Demand Response (DR). Thus, enabling the consumer to become an important player in energy management and optimization. This paper embeds a two fold contribution, (i)classification of DR techniques based on the chosen criteria, and (ii) distinctive discussion of latest DR optimization techniques. It is foreseen that this paper will help in determining future research directions and design efforts for developing DR techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".