MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009770692 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4000

Abstract 4000: Cellular MRI of human breast cancer cells labeled with gadofluorine M

2010· article· en· W2009770692 on OpenAlexaff
Michael M. Lizardo, John A. Ronald, Yuanxin Chen, Bernd Misselwitz, Brian K. Rutt, Ann F. Chambers

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer FoundationWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelaxometryMagnetic resonance imagingIn vivoHuman breastCellMetastasisIn vitroBreast cancerCancerChemistryCancer cellMetastatic breast cancerPathologyNuclear medicineNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicineBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ability to non-invasively locate and quantify tumor cell number at a metastatic site would be of considerable interest in pre-clinical and clinical metastasis research. To this end, our objective is to develop positive-contrast cellular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for use in quantifying tumor cell number at a metastatic site in vivo. The goals of the current study were to characterize the in vitro labeling of MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN human breast cancer cells with a novel positive contrast MR agent Gadofluorine M (GdF), and to demonstrate the detectability of GdF-labeled cells in vitro at clinical strength MRI (1.5 and 3Tesla) scanners. Briefly, cells (1.5 × 107cells) were loaded by simple incubation for 24h with GdF at concentrations ranging from 25μM to 10mM. GdF-loading from 25μM to 1000μM did not result in significant changes in metabolic activity. Higher GdF-loading concentrations, 2500μM and 10mM, resulted in a 16% and 21% reduction in metabolic activity, respectively. The lowest GdF-loading concentration used (25μM) resulted in a significant (9-fold) increase in MR signal enhancement which then plateaued from 100μM to 1000μM. T1-relaxometry of cell pellets demonstrated a similar statistical trend in relaxation rates of cell pellets for all loading conditions, and at both field strengths. Inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy was performed on the cell pellet extracts to assess the average amount of GdF that had accumulated per cell at each incubating concentration. Since the relaxivity of an MR contrast agent can be affected by its intracellular location, we assessed whether internalized GdF-cc (GdF analog where the mannose moiety was replaced with carbocyanine) was cytosolic or compartmentalized into endosomes, via immunostaining for mannose-6-phosphate receptor. Using confocal fluorescence microscopy, we found that GdF is largely cytosolic and did not co-localize to late endosomes, an optimal situation for achieving maximum positive-contrast by T1-shortening since endosomal compartmentalization can lessen the enhancement seen in MR images. From these results, we have determined that the GdF loading concentration of 1000μM permits the highest payload for detection by cellular MRI in clinical field strength scanners. Information from this proof-of-principle study will support future work to develop positive-contrast cellular MRI as a new approach to quantitative imaging of metastatic cells in vivo. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207