MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009834578 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1412216111

Approximation of the expected value of the harmonic mean and some applications

2014· article· en· W2009834578 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorOutlierMathematicsFilter (signal processing)HarmonicApplied mathematicsLimit (mathematics)Convergence (economics)Image (mathematics)Rate of convergenceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisKey (lock)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the harmonic mean (HM) is mentioned in textbooks along with the arithmetic mean (AM) and the geometric mean (GM) as three possible ways of summarizing the information in a set of observations, its appropriateness in some statistical applications is not mentioned in textbooks. During the last 10 y a number of papers were published giving some statistical applications where HM is appropriate and provides a better performance than AM. In the present paper some additional applications of HM are considered. The key result is to find a good approximation to [Formula: see text], the expectation of the harmonic mean of n observations from a probability distribution. In this paper a second-order approximation to [Formula: see text] is derived and applied to a number of problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it