Reinforcement Load and Compression of Reinforced Soil Mass under Surcharge Loading
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reinforced soil composites and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls are frequently employed to carry large surcharge or footing loads. For the safety and serviceability of these reinforced soil structures, it is necessary to analyze the reinforcement load and compression of reinforced soil mass subjected to surcharge loading. In the research reported in this paper, an analytical method proposed by the writer was extended to meet these needs. The extended analytical method explicitly considers soil nonlinearity, soil dilatancy, soil-reinforcement interaction, and end restrictions of reinforced soil mass. Both plane-strain and triaxial stress states can be considered in the method. The applicability of the method for reinforcement load was validated against eight large-scale tests of reinforced soil mass or MSE walls, and the method for reinforced soil compression was validated against two large-scale tests. The compressions of four reinforced soil minipiers under surcharge loading were also predicted. The proposed method has the capacity to unify the analyses of reinforcement load and compression of a reinforced soil mass under low to medium surcharge loading. Some issues in the application of the proposed method are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it