MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009842153 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1896

502 IDENTIFICATION OF THE BINDING DOMAINS THAT ENABLE THE LIGAND-INDEPENDENT CO-ACTIVATION OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR BY GLI2

2013· article· en· W2009842153 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Na Li, Mengqian Chen, Ralph Buttyan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGLI2Androgen receptorAndrogenLNCaPTranscription factorCancer researchProstate cancerMedicineBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineCancerBiochemistryGeneHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Basic Research (III)1 Apr 2013502 IDENTIFICATION OF THE BINDING DOMAINS THAT ENABLE THE LIGAND-INDEPENDENT CO-ACTIVATION OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR BY GLI2 Na Li, Mengqian Chen, and Ralph Buttyan Na LiNa Li Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , Mengqian ChenMengqian Chen Columbia, SC More articles by this author , and Ralph ButtyanRalph Buttyan Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1896AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Gli proteins are transcription factors that mediate Hedgehog signaling. Gli activity guides cell fate decisions during development and is required for the proper morphogenesis of embryonic tissues, including the prostate gland. Previously, we showed that exogenous overexpression of Gli1 or Gli2 in androgen-deprived LNCaP cells increased the expressions of androgen-dependent genes in prostate cancer (PCa) cells and conferred androgen-independent growth (Chen et al., Mol Cancer, 9: 89-101, 2010). We also showed that Gli1 or Gli2 proteins co-immunoprecipitate with AR, suggesting that AR interacts with Gli proteins to mediate these effects. Based upon this data, we proposed that Gli1/2 proteins are ligand-independent co-activators of AR in PCa. To better understand the Gli2-AR interaction and its effects on PCa responsiveness to androgen ablation, we fine mapped the specific interaction domains between Gli2 and AR. METHODS Complete or partial recombinant Gli2 cDNAs were tagged with GST and the GST-tagged proteins were purified on glutathione beads prior to incubation with in vitro translated human AR protein fragments. Domain-specific Gli2 polypeptides were tested for their ability to co-activate AR in transient expression assays using luciferase reporter vectors under the control of AR-dependent gene promoters and enhancers in 293T cells. Gli2 was tested for its ability to co-activate natural truncated variants of the AR. RESULTS GST pulldown assays showed that GLI2 specifically recognizes and binds the Tau5 region within the AR N-terminal domain (AA 391-555). Likewise, AR binds to Gli2 within an extended C-terminal domain (AA 628-1091) that may involve 2 distinct AR binding sites. AR co-activation studies in 293T cells showed that the presence of both the AR binding site(s) and the Gli2 activation domain are required for Gli2 co-activation of AR. The interaction of Gli2 with the Tau4 domain of AR was consistent with the ability of Gli2 to co-activate truncated variants of the AR that lack the DNA binding domain. CONCLUSIONS Gli2 co-activation of AR requires direct interaction between the tau5 domain in the AR N-terminus and the AR binding domains in the Gli2 C-terminus as well as the Gli2 activation domain. Gli2 binding at tau5 supports co-activation of the wildtype AR (in both the presence or absence of androgen) as well as co-activation of truncated receptors that do not bind androgens. As such, the evidence that Gli2 expression is increased in PCa by androgen ablation suggests that it may be a factor in progression to castration resistant PCa. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e206 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Na Li Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Mengqian Chen Columbia, SC More articles by this author Ralph Buttyan Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesFrench-language works237,207