Recontextualizing Learning in Nursing Education: Taking an Ontological Turn
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ontological focus has been embedded within nursing education since its inception. There has been a strong emphasis on teaching students to become safe, competent nurses by translating knowledge into clinical action. But how would nursing education shift if we were to more intentionally orient the educative process ontologically and explicitly put epistemology at the service of ontology? We consider this question of an ontological turn in nursing education by examining what is commonly referred to in nursing curricula as interpersonal communication. With the goal of providing learning opportunities that can support students to develop confident and competent practice within the shifting, complex terrain of contemporary health care milieus, we explore the possibility of shifting the relationship between epistemology and ontology, and purposefully orienting the educative process in such a way that emphasizes and illuminates the manner in which nursing knowledge and action intersect with subjectivity and context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it