MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009868947 · doi:10.1134/s1054661806040079

Off-line recognition of handwritten middle age Persian characters using moment

2006· article· en· W2009868947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePattern Recognition and Image Analysis · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZernike polynomialsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceCharacter (mathematics)Velocity MomentsCharacter recognitionInvariant (physics)Moment (physics)MathematicsGrayscaleComputer scienceImage (mathematics)GeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the performance of several moment invariant features combined with various classification methods for the recognition of middle age Persian manuscripts is presented. Specifically, Legendre moments (order 2 to 12), Zernike and pseudo-Zernike moments (order 2 to 15), and the set of invariant moments (ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , ..., ϕ 7 ) are used as features. These features are computed from four versions of character images; (1) grayscale character images (Set A), (2) semithresholded character images (Set B), (3) binarized character images (Set C), (4) character skeleton (Set D). For classification, we have used the minimum Mean Distance (MMD), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and Parzen methods. The experiment yielded a 2.86% error rate (97.14% classification rate) with pseudo-Zernike moments on the semithresholded character images (set B).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it