MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009870025 · doi:10.1177/0964663907082734

Security and Migration Law in the Less Brave New World

2007· article· en· W2009870025 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine Dauvergne

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial & Legal Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExceptionalismSecuritizationLawPolitical scienceIrregular migrationNorm (philosophy)Law and economicsSociologyEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the shifting relationship between security concerns and migration law, considering in particular the tensions in this relationship since the events of September 11, 2001. It focuses on a series of high profile cases testing provisions allowing for the indefinite detention of non-nationals in the United Kingdom, the United States, New Zealand and Canada. These cases are the basis for the conclusion that the transformed securitization of migration law leads to a new challenge for the rule of law. As security becomes the norm for migration law, its traditional exceptionalism is being called into question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial & Legal StudiesSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207