MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009906984 · doi:10.1049/ip-com:20040400

AQM controller design for IP routers supporting TCP flows based on pole placement

2004· article· en· W2009906984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive queue managementControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Full state feedbackTransient (computer programming)QueueComputer scienceControl (management)Network congestionComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simple pole placement technique in classical control theory is exploited to propose two kinds of controllers for active queue management (AQM) in IP routers: the proportional controller based on pole placement (P_PP controller) and the proportional-plus-integral controller based on pole placement (PI_PP controller). The damping ratio ξ and the undamped natural frequency ωn are appropriately chosen such that the transient response of the system is satisfied and all the poles lie in the left-half s-plane to guarantee the stability of the system. The authors verify the effectiveness of the controllers via extensive simulations using OPNET, including the case of different time-varying round-trip times (RTTs) for different connections. Simulation results show that choosing appropriate values of ξ and ωn can successfully satisfy the transient response of the system. The impact of different values of ξ and ωn on the system performance is also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it