MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2009923844 · doi:10.1115/fuelcell2006-97234

Design and Optimization of the Gas Channels of a PEMFC Using CFD-Based Simulation

2006· article· en· W2009923844 on OpenAlexafffund
Pang‐Chieh Sui, S. Kumar, Ned Djilali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsBallard Power Systems (Canada)University of Victoria
FundersMitacsBallard Power Systems
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsProton exchange membrane fuel cellMechanical engineeringMesh generationSimulationComputer scienceMaterials scienceMechanicsEngineeringFinite element methodStructural engineeringFuel cellsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow field plate of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) functions as electron conductor and provides the pathway for oxidant and fuel to reach the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). CFD-based simulation tools can be effective in designing and optimization of flow field plates as they cab fully account for the complexity and coupling of various transport phenomena as well as the 3-D geometry. The objective of this paper is to report on the development of such a simulation platform and on its application to investigate the impact of several geometric parameters on fuel cell performance and detailed distribution of transport processes. The simulation tool is built upon a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, CFD-ACE+, along with supporting software and script codes to automate the design workflow. A 3-D, straight channel model with material properties and model parameters validated with experimental data is used as the baseline for the present study. The workflow includes automated grid generation, model setup and job execution. Parametric study is performed for geometric parameters including (1) Channel width versus land area width (2) Channel height (3) Channel pitch and length, as well as material parameters including (4) Porosity and (5) Electrical conductivity of the gas diffusion layer (GDL). Among these parameters, it is found that predicted cell performance is most sensitive to the channel/land width ratio and to the anisotropy of the GDL property. When isotropic properties are used for the GDL, the predicted cell performance decreases with increasing channel/land width ratio. This is because the current distribution in the MEA is dictated by electrical conduction through the GDL and increasing channel width causes current to peak underneath the land area, which in turn increases ohmic losses. When the in-plane electrical conductivity is reduced, the effect of mass transfer on the current distribution becomes comparable to electron transfer and the predicted trend line of cell performance shows an optimum value as a function of the channel/land width ratio. The CFD based design tool developed in the present work has the advantage of providing more reliable prediction than methods based on reduced dimensionality or simplified transport models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→