MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009939102 · doi:10.1021/jp9068653

Surface Tension of Solids in the Absence of Adsorption

2009· article· en· W2009939102 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hadi Ghasemi, C. A. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsAdsorptionSurface tensionSolid surfaceValue (mathematics)Materials scienceThermodynamicsSurface (topology)ChemistryPhysical chemistryChemical physicsMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method has been recently proposed for determining the value of the surface tension of a solid in the absence of adsorption, gammaS0, using material properties determined from vapor adsorption experiments. If valid, the value obtained for gammaS0 must be independent of the vapor used. We apply the proposed method to determine the value of gammaS0 for four solids using at least two vapors for each solid and find results that support the proposed method for determining gammaS0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207