MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009947569 · doi:10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0001

Contaminant intrusion in water distribution systems: An ingress model

2013· article· en· W2009947569 on OpenAlexafffund
Saheb Mansour‐Rezaei, Gholamreza Naser

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsIntrusionDimensionless quantityGeotechnical engineeringFactorial experimentEnvironmental sciencePipe network analysisGeologySoil scienceMathematicsStatisticsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a water distribution system, low or negative pressure may occur under normal operation of the system and may lead to contaminant intrusion. To assess the risk associated with contaminant intrusion, exposure assessment is required. To have more accurate intrusion exposure assessment, the effects of the surrounding soil on the intrusion rate must be considered. This research proposes a model to create a more realistic estimation of intrusion rate. A two‐level factorial design was used to screen the effect of pipe internal pressure, soil porosity, average diameter of soil particles, size of the leak point, and pipe burial depth. The Buckingham p theorem was applied to group the influential factors into a set of dimensionless p parameters. The relationship among the p parameters was obtained by using the numerical data generated by a two‐dimensional finite element model for flow in a saturated zone surrounding a pipe. A regression analysis was then applied to find the best fit for the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207