MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009970826 · doi:10.1260/136943304323213166

Laboratory Investigation of Local Bending in Profiled Thermoplastic Pipes

2004· article· en· W2009970826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Structural Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Properties and Processing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBendingMaterials scienceComposite materialStructural engineeringSpan (engineering)ThermoplasticEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full-scale pipe tests were conducted to investigate local bending on profiles of different thermoplastic pipes. Five profiled pipes including two lined corrugated, one box and one tubular profile of HDPE material and one ribbed profile of PVC material were considered. The study demonstrates that a three-dimensional bending mechanism governs the strains on some components of the pipe profiles. The local bending was particularly significant in the lined corrugated and the tubular profiled pipes. The mechanism of the local bending at the crown and the springline was different for lined corrugated pipes under biaxial loading. Ratios of the circumferential strains on the liner to those at the inner wall were higher at the crown/invert than the ratios at the springline. The liner with longer span was found to undergo even lesser strain relative to the liner with shorter span. The local bending did not affect the strain on the other elements of the lined corrugated profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it