MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010020841 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2015.2416175

Outage Analysis of ZFB-MRT/MRC Underlay Two-Way Relay Systems

2015· article· en· W2010020841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderlayRelayMaximal-ratio combiningFadingBeamformingTransmission (telecommunications)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer sciencePath lossAntenna (radio)Outage probabilitySignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)TelecommunicationsComputer networkMathematicsPower (physics)PhysicsWirelessCombinatoricsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyse the end-to-end (E2E) outage probabilities (OPs) of zero-forcing beamforming and maximal-ratio-transmission/combining (ZFB-MRT/MRC) for an underlay network, which consists of a single-antenna fixed-gain amplify-and-forward (AF) two-way relay and two multi-antenna terminals. Assuming both path loss effects and small-scale fading and considering both secondary-to-primary (S2P) and primary-to-secondary (P2S) interferences, the exact and asymptotic E2E OPs are derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it