MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010027539 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n6p37

An Improved UPFC Control to Enhance Power System Stability

2010· article· en· W2010027539 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ashwin Kumar Sahoo, Subhransu Sekhar Dash, T. Thyagarajan

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnified power flow controllerControl theory (sociology)Flexible AC transmission systemComputer scienceElectric power systemAC powerFuzzy logicController (irrigation)Control systemTransmission systemControl engineeringVoltagePower (physics)Transmission (telecommunications)Power flowEngineeringControl (management)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an application of Single- Input Fuzzy Logic Controller (SFLC) to determine the control signal of Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) for improvement of power system stability. This compensation scheme relevant to Flexible AC Transmission systems (FACTS) technology is used worldwide to improve system dynamic performance. The UPFC is one of the most versatile flexible AC transmission system devices, which can be used to control the active and reactive power flows in a transmission line by injecting a variable voltage in series and reactive current in shunt. The SFLC uses only one input variable which is called as signed distance. The SFLC has many advantages: The total number of rules is greatly reduced compared to existing fuzzy logic controllers (FLC’s), and hence, generation and tuning of control rules are much easier. The proposed control method is applied to Single Machine Infinite Bus (SMIB) System to improve the transient stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207