MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010050236 · doi:10.1118/1.4735745

SU-F-BRCD-07: Experimental Validation of Fluence Field Modulation for Noise and Dose Management in CT

2012· article· en· W2010050236 on OpenAlexaff
S Bartolac, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomImage qualityFluenceFilter (signal processing)Nuclear medicineNoise (video)Projection (relational algebra)DosimetryOpticsPhysicsMedicineMathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Dose management in CT is a growing concern as the number of CT scans per capita rises. Fluence field modulated computed tomography (FFMCT) is a proposed approach for more optimal dose management, where the incident fluence pattern can change independently for each projection in order to minimize dose while meeting prescribed image quality metrics. This work studies the application of FFMCT for dose and noise management to a small cylindrical phantom. METHODS: Experiments were carried out on an experimental CT system using a small cylindrical phantom comprised of acrylic spheres, water and teflon rods as the object of interest. Modulation of the incident fluence was optimized using a simulated annealing algorithm that attempts to achieve user-prescribed, regionally varying SNR criteria while limiting dose. The modulated projections were synthesized from projection sets taken at various tube current settings. SNR patterns and predicted dose outcomes were compared to the prescribed values as well as against expected results using a bowtie filter. RESULTS: FFMCT resulted in SNR outcomes with greater agreement to the prescribed regionally varying SNR criteria than achieved by the bowtie filter. Dose reductions were observed for the majority of the object, and reached as high as 60%. Limited regions, coinciding with lower noise, observed dose increases less than 20%. Integral dose reduction over the entire object was greater than 40% when compared to a bowtie filter with comparable image quality in the region of interest. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that FFMCT has the potential to meet user-prescribed, regionally varying image quality objectives, while decreasing radiation dose to the patient. These results suggest that given a suitable collimator approach, fluence field modulated computed tomography could reap significant benefits in terms of reducing dose and optimizing image quality. NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207