Contre vents et marées : le délégué au cœur du renouveau syndical
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir d’une enquête menée auprès de 1 105 délégués parmi les enseignants dans le secteur de l’éducation au Québec, cet article porte sur le rôle des délégués dans les établissements scolaires et les conditions qui renforcent leur capacité d’agir dans le contexte de la « nouvelle gestion publique » (NGP). Si la mise en œuvre de la NGP engendre de fortes pressions dans les milieux de travail et complexifie le rôle des acteurs locaux, la décentralisation de certains pouvoirs vers l’établissement offre aussi de nouveaux espaces pour la représentation syndicale, ce qui suppose que les délégués soient en mesure d’occuper ces espaces. Ce sont les aptitudes stratégiques des délégués ainsi que la mobilisation des ressources de pouvoir internes et externes qui renforcent leur capacité d’agir dans ce nouveau contexte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".