Long-Term Behavior of CaO-Based Pellets Supported by Calcium Aluminate Cements in a Long Series of CO<sub>2</sub> Capture Cycles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of carbonation/calcination tests consisting of 1000 cycles was performed with CaO-based pellets prepared using hydrated lime and calcium aluminate cement. The change in CO 2 carrying capacity of the sorbent was investigated in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) apparatus and the morphology of residues after those cycles in the TGA was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Larger quantities of sorbent pellets underwent 300 carbonation/calcination cycles in a tube furnace (TF), and their properties were examined by nitrogen physisorption tests (BET and BJH). The crushing strength of the pellets before and after the CO 2 cycles was determined by means of a custom-made strength testing apparatus. The results showed high CO 2 carrying capacity in long series of cycles with an extremely high residual activity of the order of 28%. This superior performance is a result of favorable morphology due to the existence of large numbers of nanosized pores suitable for carbonation. This morphology is relatively stable during cycles due to the presence of mayenite (Ca 12 Al 14 O 33 ) in the CaO structure. However, the crushing tests showed that pellets lost strength after 300 carbonation/calcination cycles, and this appears to be due to the cracks formed in the pellets. This effect was not observed in smaller particles suitable for use in fluidized bed (FBC) systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it