MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010125894 · doi:10.7202/1022834ar

Entre nationalisme et socialisme : Raoul Roy (1914-1996) et les origines d’un premier indépendantisme socialiste au Québec, 1935-1965

2014· article· fr· W2010125894 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mathieu Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contribution à une histoire approfondie des débuts de l’indépendantisme, cet article présente l’étonnant parcours idéologique de Raoul Roy (1914-1996), fondateur des deux premières institutions de l’indépendantisme de gauche, La Revue socialiste (1959-1965) et l'Action socialiste pour l’indépendance du Québec (ASIQ, 1960-C.1963). Jeune autodidacte campagnard ballotté par la Crise, Roy se dit « séparatiste » à la fin des années 1930 et prône le fascisme comme moyen de libération des Canadiens français, tout en étant attiré par le communisme. Militant après la Deuxième Guerre mondiale dans le mouvement communiste (Parti ouvrier-progressiste) sans nécessairement avoir à renier son nationalisme, il fondera à la fin des années 1950 l’indépendantisme de gauche en élaborant une première version de l’indépendantisme socialiste de décolonisation, dans laquelle le nationalisme prime nettement le socialisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelleSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207