MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010130361 · doi:10.1289/ehp.120-a205b

Migration Associated with Climate Change: Modern Face of an Ancient Phenomenon

2012· letter· en· W2010130361 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia R. Barrett

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Perspectives · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeGeographyPopulationExtreme weatherGlobal warmingEcologyEnvironmental healthMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse respiratory effects and short-term hospital admissions have been linked to acute exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), but few studies have examined mortality risks associated with chronic exposure.Now, in Canada's first national-level cohort study of the subject, investigators report an association between cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to PM 2.5 [EHP 120(5):708-714; Crouse et al.].Most research examining associations between ambient air pollution and human health has used data generated by ground-based air-pollution monitors over short periods of time.But in the current study, researchers also calculated long-term exposure levels using satellite-based estimates of ground-level PM 2.5 .Study subjects consisted of 2.1 million adults who were included in the 1991-2001 Canadian census mortality follow-up study.For residents of cities with ground-based air monitors, the investigators calculated average mean annual concentrations of PM 2.5 for the period 1987-2001 and assigned exposure levels to individuals based on their residence during that time.They also calculated exposure estimates for the whole cohort for the period 2001-2006 based on satellite remote sensing observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0130.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health PerspectivesSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207