MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

pWeb: A personal interface to the world wide web

2014· article· en· W2010132638 on OpenAlexaff
Reaz Ahmed, Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury, Alexander Pokluda, Md. Faizul Bari, Raouf Boutaba, Bertrand Mathieu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebWeb serviceThe InternetScalabilityDirectory serviceUser interfaceAndroid (operating system)DirectoryDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centralized social networking and media sharing portals provide inadequate support for preserving user privacy, content ownership and control. These problems can be mitigated through distributed Web services as demonstrated by a number of academic projects and industrial deployments. In general, these distributed services do not assign globally recognized, persistent names to the user devices. As a result, these solutions work in isolation and also cannot inter-operate with traditional Web technology. In this work, we present a decentralized and scalable platform, named pWeb, for distributing web services, like online social networks and media streaming, across end-user devices. pWeb assigns Internet compatible names to end-user devices, and provides name resolution and directory services. A user can retain ownership, and make the services and contents in his devices searchable and accessible at different privacy levels, e.g., friends, family and public. New services can be easily developed and deployed over the pWeb platform. We have developed a working prototype of the platform, and to demonstrate its effectiveness we have implemented a video streaming application for Android and Windows platforms. We also present performance results from our prototype implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207