MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010150372 · doi:10.3795/ksme-b.2011.35.2.197

Experimental Study on Peak-Pressure Variation Due to Compression by Using RCM

2011· article· en· W2010150372 on OpenAlexaff
Hye-Min Kim, Hak-Young Kim, Seung‐Wook Baek

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompression (physics)Variation (astronomy)Computer scienceMaterials scienceComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RCM(Rapid Compression Machine)은 엔진 내부의 복잡한 연소현상을 연구하는 데 적합한 장치이다. 엔진의 연구를 위해서는 내부의 최대압력을 측정하는 것이 중요하다. 그 이유는 최대압력이 내부 연료의 연소특성에 큰 영향을 끼치기 때문이며, 연소실 내부의 최대온도가 최대 압력에 의해 추정되기 때문이다. 그러나 최대압력은 실린더 벽면과의 열전달로 인해 정량적으로 계산하기 어려우며 보통 실험적인 방법을 통해 측정하고 있다. 본 연구를 통해 RCM의 구동시간에 따른 연소실의 최대압력과의 관계를 실험적으로 확인하고, 실험결과를 바탕으로 최대압력과 구동시간에 관한 일반적인 공식을 도출한다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers BSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207