MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010156195 · doi:10.2118/01-01-das

Some Recent Developments in SAGD

2001· article· en· W2010156195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger M. Butler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteam-assisted gravity drainagePetroleum engineeringOil sandsSteam injectionWaste managementAsphaltEnvironmental scienceEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is being used increasingly for the recovery of bitumen and heavy oil in Canada. Four large SAGD projects are under construction in Athabasca and two others have been announced. These projects are expected to produce bitumen economically and with a recovery greater than 50%. Productivity will be close to 1000 B/d per well pair. There are also many successful smaller, and growing, projects and pilots in Athabasca, Cold Lake and Lloydminster. Because of the rising costs of fuel it is desirable to reduce steam requirements for SAGD. Means for doing this include cogeneration of steam and power, alternate fuels, choosing better reservoirs, improved heat recovery, and the newer related processes, SAGP and Vapex. In Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD)(1), Steam and Gas Push (SAGP)(2), and Vapour Extraction (Vapex)(3) the oil isduced in viscosity and produced by gravity drainage to horizontalells placed low in the reservoir. As the oil drains, the vacatedreservoir pores are filled largely with gas/steam in SAGD, steam lus non-condensible gas in SAGP and solvent vapour plus noncondensible gas in Vapex. A common feature of the three processes is that the use of long horizontal wells combined with the reduced viscosity of the produced oil allows the production of oil with essentially no by-pass of free gas. In suitable reservoirs economic rates are achieved whereas with conventional wells or without adequate viscosity reduction there would be intolerable gas coning. High recoveries are obtained because of the systematic nature of the drainage. Since the author's earlier paper in this series(4) there has been a great increase in the interest in this subject and there are now many substantial field projects in various stages of planning and construction. Advanced Commercial SAGD Projects In Athabasca SAGD is at the stage where several major field projects to recover bitumen from Athabasca are either under construction or about to be. In most cases, the reservoirs are thicker than those that have been exploited previously and superior results are anticipated. The initial investment for large SAGD projects is of the order of $10,000 Canadian per B/d of capacity and the Steam Oil Ratio (SOR) is about 1.9 to 2.5. The supply costs for bitumen will probably be less than $10 Canadian per barrel, including return but excluding the fuel cost. This important cost is discussed later. Generally product lifting from the reservoir is by natural flow, a technique first demonstrated by Sceptre Resources and now used in several of the pilots. Four large commercial SAGD projects are described below. A recovery of over 50﹪ of the oil in place is expected in each. Figure 1 shows the approximate locations of the projects discussed below. Alberta Energy Company (AEC) Foster Creek (T70 R4 W4M)(5) This is a commercial expansion of AEC's pilot project, which produces 2,000 B/d from three SAGD well pairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207