Cut-Flower Exports, Female Labor, and Community Participation in Highland Ecuador
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the 1980s and 1990s Latin American economies and societies underwent a profound transformation caused by the advent of economic neoliberalism. Upon the recommendation of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and bilateral donors, most Latin American governments implemented structural adjustment programs as a cure for the ills of import-substitution industrialization and burgeoning foreign debt. Along with short-term stabilization measures, these programs included broader reforms designed to reduce state economic intervention and increase national integration with global markets. At the regional level, they reduced inflation rates and triggered a rapid growth of exports and foreign direct investment (Mortimer, 2000; Macario, 2000). They failed, however, to produce a significant positive effect on national economic growth and employment. Indeed, urban unemployment rates increased in the 1990s (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, cited in Stark, 2001: Table 4). Moreover, structural adjustment led to a decline in real minimum wages and cuts in government social services. The result was an increase in income inequalities
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it