MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010197133 · doi:10.1063/1.1823043

<i>In situ</i> neutron diffraction studies on the elevated-temperature deformation behavior of a TiAl–W alloy

2004· article· en· W2010197133 on OpenAlexaff
Hahn Choo, Dongyi Seo, J. Beddoes, M.A.M. Bourke, Donald W. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuasistatic processMaterials scienceNeutron diffractionCreepAlloyAnisotropyQuasistatic loadingLattice constantUltimate tensile strengthTensile testingComposite materialDiffractionMetallurgyCrystallographyThermodynamicsCrystal structureChemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of elastic lattice strain in a Ti–48Al–2W (at.%) alloy, subjected to (1) quasistatic tensile loading and (2) constant-load tensile creep, was investigated at 1033K using in situ neutron diffraction. During the quasistatic test to a maximum stress of 435MPa, a- and c-axes lattice strains increased linearly with a small degree of anisotropy (E¯a∕E¯c≅0.9) up to 200MPa, followed by a significant redistribution of load above 260MPa due to the plastic anisotropy. Time-resolved in situ measurements were also performed during the creep at 276 and 327MPa. The results show that lattice strain evolution during the primary creep is qualitatively similar to the quasistatic case under the current test conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy PropertiesFrench-language works237,207