MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010198941 · doi:10.2118/05-08-wpc2

Coalbed Methane Development: Practices and Progress in Canada

2005· article· en· W2010198941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Gatens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCoalbed methaneNatural gasCoalUnconventional oilMethaneDrillingEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringCoal miningFossil fuelMining engineeringWaste managementEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As conventional gas supplies decline, unconventional sources of gas, like coalbed methane (CBM), will become increasingly important in Canada. Canada has over 700 Tcf of CBM gas resource in place, comparable to the U.S. resource. Canada now has the world's largest "dry" coal play and it is estimated (as shown below) that CBM will grow to 2 - 3 Bcf/d in production over the next 10 – 20 years and lead to recovery of up to 75 Tcf of gas. Since 2000, increased drilling activity has led to over 3,000 CBM wells and 150 MMcf/d of CBM production in Canada today, with both estimated to grow substantially in 2005 and beyond. CBM will become an increasingly important part of Canada's gas supply. Introduction Coalbed methane (CBM) is simply the natural gas that is generated by coal seams during the coalification process. It is "sweet gas" (not sour), is largely comprised of methane (>90%), and is similar to the natural gas that is burned in homes. In Alberta, the Department of Energy (DOE) refers to CBM as natural gas from coal, or NGC, to associate it with existing regulations which govern the production of natural gas. In British Columbia (BC), it is referred to by the Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) as coalbed gas, or CBG. Regardless of the name used, it is the same gas. CBM reservoirs are classified as "unconventional" and have gas storage and production mechanisms that distinguish them from conventional reservoirs. Most of the gas in coal is stored in a sorbed state within the coal matrix, physically attached to the complex internal surfaces of the coal as a function of pressure, characterized by sorption isotherms(1, 2). Coals which are suitable for CBM production are naturally fractured, with closely spaced natural fractures, or "cleats," which provide pathways for gas flow from the coal matrix. In many cases, but not all, these cleats are initially full of water, which must be produced to reduce the pressure around the coal matrix allowing the sorbed gas to desorb and become free gas which can then be produced. The gas storage and production mechanisms of coals are comprehensively covered in References (1) and (2) and elsewhere in the oil and gas literature. In Canada, commercial production of CBM has only recently begun. The objective of this paper is to provide a summary of the major coal groups being targeted for development in Canada and an update on the recent evaluation and development. Predictions of future performance will also be presented. CBM History in the U.S. Commercial development of CBM began in the U.S. in the 1980s. Initial efforts to remove the gas from coals were funded by the U.S. Bureau of Mines primarily to improve mine safety. As natural gas value increased, the research began to focus on capturing the CBM for commercial use, and hundreds of millions of dollars were dedicated to research and development projects by the U.S. DOE, the Gas Research Institute (GRI), and the industry(3–7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207