Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to review the radiologic findings of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital infection control computer database was used to identify patients who had a CA-MRSA infection with organisms isolated from blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or pleural fluid samples. Criteria for CA-MRSA pneumonia were consolidation seen on chest radiography or computed tomography (CT), growth of MRSA from sputum and/or sterile pulmonary site, clinical complaints of cough and/or shortness of breath. Chest radiographs and CT scans for 9 patients (5 men, mean age 45 y, range 35 to 71 y) were retrospectively reviewed by 2 chest radiologists. RESULTS: The most common chest radiographic finding was consolidation, which was bilateral in 7 patients and unilateral in 2 patients. The consolidation was patchy and nonsegmental in 5 and segmental in 4 patients. Two patients had cavitation evident on the chest radiograph. The most common CT scan findings were bilateral (n=8), often symmetric (n=5) consolidation, bilateral septal lines (n=7), and multiple nodules (n=5). Cavitation was present in 5 patients, either in regions of consolidation (n=5) or in large nodules (n=3). Five patients with CA-MRSA pneumonia had rapid clinical deterioration requiring ventilatory support. Two patients died. CONCLUSIONS: CA-MRSA pneumonia is characterized by extensive bilateral consolidation and frequent cavitation and is commonly associated with rapid progression and clinical deterioration. CT is superior to radiography in demonstrating the presence of cavitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".